Shell sponsorship and censorship at Southbank Centre?

On 29th June, the Arts Council England finally announced its new “Catalyst Arts” philanthropy programme, aimed at pushing arts organisations towards a US-style corporate and private philanthropy culture. It’s ironic that 3 days later, PLATFORM had a close encounter with censorship from a major arts venue, the Shell-sponsored Southbank Centre, London.

As part of the London Literature Festival, PLATFORM was invited to present our forthcoming book “The Oil Road” (by Mika Minio and James Marriott), alongside writer Neal Ascherson and moderator Gareth Evans on 3rd July. The Oil Road is a travelogue and analysis of how oil travels from the Caspian to Europe. It focuses on human rights and environmental impacts of one particular pipeline, chiefly backed by oil company BP.

We had emailed with the SBC events manager in advance about bringing materials to put out on a table for the audience’s interest, to which she agreed.

On arrival half an hour before the event, the events manager stated she needed to check with the marketing manager about our supporting literature and that this is standard practice. It was the Duty Manager who explained that material could not be put out which could be seen to be inciting action or being overtly critical of Shell. (This is not a direct quote but paraphrase.)

Our materials – which as it happens were mostly focused on BP and RBS – were looked at cursorily, and all were “passed” after questions such as “is there anything on Shell in this?”.

This was a clear example of the dangers to freedom of expression which are only set to increase under a push towards corporate philanthropy, unless bold moves are made to stand firm on ethics and censorship.

It’s also an example of massive internal contradictions within an organisation. SBC staff attempted to mute discussion on important environmental issues pertaining to Shell, because of risk of offence to a major sponsor. Yet other staff were happy to programme an event that was detailing similar abuses of power by BP.

This was not the first time we have experienced trouble and confused messages from SBC over Shell, when we have been an agreed part of their programme:

- During the Freedom and Culture Festival, on 10 November 2007, SBC staff presented sudden strong objections to the temporary placement of the Living Memorial to Ken Saro-Wiwa on Queen Elizabeth Walk, which had been carefully planned and agreed. SBC was part of the original Remember Saro-Wiwa Coalition (run by PLATFORM) and had previously programmed a major event on this, which was heavily critical of Shell, featuring Wole Soyinka, Lemn Sissay, Alice Oswald and others.

- During LIFT’s “A Parliament for Climate Change”, held at SBC on 6 July 2008, LIFT staff were put under pressure over an event PLATFORM was running that debated the ethics of Shell’s sponsorship of SBC in light of abuses in Nigeria and climate change.

Last week, in a letter to SBC’s Artistic Director Jude Kelly we challenged SBC on the censorship issue, and demanded to know what their policy was with regard to programming artists who may be critical of their sponsors. We also pointed out that Jude was the keynote speaker two days after our event, at an Index on Censorship event at Free Word (on 5th July). Her support for the crucial work of Index on Censorship seemed a massive contradiction with what we experienced at the weekend, and on previous occasions.

Jude Kelly phoned us later the same day, “to put something right that was clearly wrong”. And backed up the conversation with an email:

“…We have no policy at all that instructs staff to avoid criticism of sponsors. We do have a policy that says 3rd party advertising is by discretion -ie rival concerts…etc. But that’s not related to sponsors at all. However — i can promise you we would not create the programme of debate, polemic and inquiry around controversial and contested subjects if we separately wished to censor criticism. Nevertheless, we are to blame for not giving staff a clear guide that supports them understand the apparent contradictions that can seem to arise in a world were sponsorship and free speech live side by side. If there was confusing action that is our fault not theirs…”

One question we will be pursuing with SBC arises about written and unwritten policies. A culture can be fostered where tacit understanding is all that is needed. It can be in interest of the big arts institutions to let internal self-censorship operate when it comes to sponsorship (or any other hot political issue). Senior management can say that there is no written policy – which may be true – while staff in the Marketing or Corporate Relations department may be delivering other instructions verbally, or in informal written exchanges.

There are many precedents for senior management being seen to “keep their hands clean”, while staff in other parts of the hierarchy are handling the real agenda. Do SBC staff in Marketing and Corporate Relations agree with the position as described by the Artistic Director? The Duty Manager was absolutely clear in his message. He had been instructed.

Finally, this incident revolving around censorship does not escape from the fact that SBC takes money from the fossil fuel industry, thus endorsing climate change, rather than endorsing activity which moves us away from it. This relationship polishes the image of the oil industry, and, in the words of a recent Arts & Business report, illustrates “how the arts render authenticity to business”. The new arts philanthropy will be no more than a gloss on the barnacle of industry if we don’t have a discussion and take action urgently on where ethics and aesthetics meet.

Death knell or crying wolf?

In April the Chancellor, George Osborne, launched his ‘Fair Fuel Stabiliser’. This linked the rate of tax paid by oil companies to global oil prices. When the price of oil was above $75 a barrel, the rate of tax on North Sea oil profits would rise, with the additional revenue used to lower the price of petrol and diesel. The measure is expected to raise £2 billion pounds over the course of the Parliament, although this is cancelled out by a £2 billion reduction in income from fuel duty.

The Chancellor claimed that the stabiliser would raise enough money to avoid a planned increase in fuel duty, and also pay for a 1p per litre cut. This, he argued, would save the average driver £3 when filling up their car. The announcement followed a period of exceptional profits for the oil and gas industry, buoyed by oil prices reaching record highs.

The oil industry reacted furiously. Malcolm Webb, chief executive of industry lobby group, Oil and Gas UK claimed that, “this change in the tax regime will decrease investment, increase imports and drive UK jobs to other areas of the world.” Treasury Minister Justine Greening was reportedly “grilled alive” in a meeting with oil industry executives. A number of major oil companies announced plans to put investments on hold whilst they considered the impact of the new tax changes.

Using the threat of job losses and investment is one of the oldest tricks in the industry lobbying book. This two-part briefing by PLATFORM and Greenpeace examines the changes to North Sea tax and how the oil industry might not have it as bad as they are making it out to be, before considering ways in which the Chancellor may respond to the industry’s campaign against the changes.

You can download the briefing here.

The other offshore tax regime

The lobby machine kicked into action following the announcement by George Osbourne of plans to raise £10 billion over the next 5 years from the oil industry. Ex-PLATFORMer Greg Muttitt, author of the forthcoming book Fuel on the Fire: Oil and Politics in Occupied Iraq explains in this guest blog why the outraged claims of the oil industry in response to this move should not be taken at face value.

Platform, NEF and others are right to lament the sad sign of the times that the increase in North Sea oil taxation appears to be the most negotiable element of George Osborne’s Budget.

But before government ministers worry too much about the bruising they get from oil companies, or about newspapers’dire warnings of lost jobs, a few facts are in order.

First, and most obviously, it’s not really a tax increase at all – it’s a ‘fuel price stabiliser’. This means that overall oil taxation neither increases nor decreases. When oil price is high, upstream tax (on offshore extraction) goes up and downstream tax (on petrol, diesel etc) comes correspondingly down, and vice versa. The changes upstream and downstream balance each other out. The greenest government ever? To keep overall (upstream + downstream) oil taxes at the same level, rather than increasing them, hardly fits this claim. At best it’s a missed opportunity.

And even looking just at the North Sea on its own, it’s not a tax rise over the medium/long term, only while the oil price is high. But when the oil price comes down again, don’t expect oil companies to give anyone a bruising over their tax cut.

Second, contrary to some of the oil companies’ claims of “shock”, this ‘stabiliser’ was not a sudden, new policy. Osbornefirst suggested it in 2008, and officially announced he was considering it in last year’s emergency budget.

Third, UK oil taxation has been historically among the lowest in the world. Although it did increase in 2002 and 2005, the oil price then (and hence post-tax profits) were a lot lower than they are now. In 1997/8, when Gordon Brown considered a tax on North Sea production, the oil industry ran a massive (and successful) lobbying campaign against it, arguing that since the oil price was low, they couldn’t afford it. Now the oil price is high, the opposite argument should apply. Naturally, the companies would rather we all forgot what they said then.

In a 2009 oil industry survey, the UK was voted the companies’ favourite country to invest in, out of 152 countries (outside North America). So don’t believe the companies’ claims that they are on the verge of walking away.

If Osborne succumbed to the pressure from the oil lobby, and thus cut fuel taxes without increasing North Sea taxes, then he really would deserve a bruising.

Fuel on the Fire: Oil and Politics in Occupied Iraq is published by Random House Books on the 21st of April. People buying advance copies of the book at this site can get 30% off the cover price if they use PLATFORM as a promotional code. You can also follow Greg Muttitt on media, speaking dates and more by following @FuelontheFire on Twitter.

You can also find PLATFORM on facebook here and follow us on Twitter @PlatformLondon.

BP’s botched Arctic deal and the extent of the Foreign Office’s support

An article on the front page of the Business Section of the Telegraph today has used Freedom of Information requests obtained by PLATFORM to show how BP has used the Foreign Office to cement a controversial deal in Russia, even when the legality of the deal was in doubt. A Channel 4 Dispatches episode this evening by investigative journalist Greg Palast will be examining the relationship between the oil company and the UK government in even more detail. James Marriott of PLATFORM reports.

Bob Dudley’s attempt to relaunch BP after the nightmare of Deepwater Horizon was pegged on a bold move into the Russian Arctic. The announcement of the Arctic deal on January 14th certainly achieved the media coverage desired and helped push the share price up to its highest level since the drilling rig exploded in the Gulf of Mexico nearly nine months before.

However just nine weeks later the share value was falling again as investors absorbed the news that the Russian company AAR might severely derail the planned BP-Rosneft deal and thereby block Dudley’s strategy. Serious questions are now being asked about the judgement of Dudley’s team. For BP either knew that the deal with Rosneft was in breach of their legal agreement with BP-TNK and chose to ignore it, or they did not know and were therefore negligent.

Most likely Dudley’s team knew that there were risks and aimed to minimise them by publicly emphasizing Prime Minister Vladimir Putin’s support for the deal – it was widely trailed that Dudley had hurried to the press signing of the agreement in London directly from a meeting with Putin’s Novo-Ogaryovo residence.

BP also tried to bolster the deal by pulling in UK government support. With just three days notice they requested that either Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg or Energy & Climate Change Minister Chris Huhne attend the signing in BP’s Head Office in London.

Clearly the Dudley team used ministerial support to bolster the deal. They might have hoped that AAR would refrain from contesting the agreement because of Putin’s clear support and the UK ministerial support was used to strengthen BP’s hand by emphasizing that it is a matter of international relations.

The ability of BP to use the UK government in this way depends on the Foreign Office and related departments having a long and often unquestioning support for major oil companies such as BP and Shell. This relationship is clearly demonstrated by the 18 months of interchange between the UK’s Ambassador in Moscow, Anne Pringle, and BP over their plans to tie up with Rosneft.

It also depends upon the cultural acceptance of this kind of relationship across Whitehall and Westminster, as illustrated by the shocking paucity of debate around UK oil companies’ advances into the Arctic region. This failure of scrutiny is well highlighted in PLATFORM’s new report Arctic Anxiety.

Energy Minister Charles Hendry called the BP Rosneft deal a ‘purely commercial matter’ in the days after the signing, however the subsequent unravelling of the deal illustrates how BP utilised the UK government to bolster a highly questionable ‘commercial’ manouever. As the report requests there should be far more public scrutiny over matters where what is in BP’s interests are automatically assumed to the same as what is in the UK’s interest.

The FOI requests can be downloaded here, and you can view a one minute video on the Arctic Anxiety report here.

Below is a short online presentation of the findings of the report.

Arctic Anxiety – new report on BP’s attempts to drill in the arctic

Arctic_anxiety_cover_Versn4.jpg

‘Arctic Anxiety – BP, British foreign policy and the rush for polar oil’ can be downloaded fromhttp://platformlondon.org/aa.pdf

In the wake of Thursday´s arbitration ruling that has delayed BP´s Arctic alliance with Rosneft, Foreign Office minutes sourced through FoIA and a new report published by PLATFORM and Greenpeace UK reveal ongoing high-level support for BP without a formulated policy position or any public or parliamentary debate. Campaign groups are calling on the British government to use the window of opportunity to reverse its support for BP´s Arctic frontier plans.

James Marriott of oil industry watchdog PLATFORM said, “It’s good that the arbitration ruling has delayed BP´s dangerous Arctic drilling. Despite the motivation for the injunction, the practical outcome is that it protects the Arctic from risky efforts to explore for oil for at least a few more months. The British government should now take the responsible position of promoting an Arctic moratorium as Norway has done, rather than providing ministers at BP’s beck and call.”

The FoIA documents obtained reveal 18 months of careful build-up and close interaction between BP and the UK Embassy in Moscow. In one instance in February 2010, a civil servant minuted the benefits that the “challenging” nature of “Arctic conditions” provides for BP.

The documents also reveal the hold BP feels it has over senior ministers’ schedules. An ambassadorial email shows that BP first briefed Downing Street about its Rosneft deal on Tuesday 11 January, expecting that either Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg or Energy & Climate Change Minister Chris Huhne would then attend a signing ceremony only three days later. Chris Huhne put aside four hours of his time for the event.

PLATFORM´s report Arctic anxiety: BP, British foreign policy and the rush for polar oil, co-published with Greenpeace UK, warns that the oil plans pose enormous risks to the environment and local communities and echo current concerns around governmental support for oil companies in repressive states such as Libya.

Report author Anna Galkina of PLATFORM said, “Extracting oil in the Arctic is extremely risky. Existing spill containment methods are ineffective in icy waters, while darkness and storms make drilling sites inaccessible for months on end. Adequate safety infrastructure and oversight is non-existent. Lending high-level government support to Arctic drilling is unjustifiable, especially to the company whose poor safety management has just caused one of the worst environmental disasters in history.”
BP’s recent controversial deal with Rosneft sees the two companies create an offshore drilling area equivalent in size and reserves to the UK North Sea.

Ministers including Lord Howell (Foreign Office), Chris Huhne (Energy & Climate Change), Charles Hendry (Energy), as well as senior civil servants and dedicated FCO Energy Teams have all been enrolled in trying to break open the Arctic. Unlike the European Parliament, the House of Commons has had no discussion of Arctic issues. A poorly attended debate in the House of Lords centred around securing business opportunities for British companies. Energy Minister Hendry termed this support “purely commercial”, stripping it of any responsibility for the impacts of oil development in the Arctic on natural environments, and concerns for the rights of the region’s Indigenous population.

PLATFORM’s original research indicates that Western companies involved in joint ventures in Russia tend to show only a formal presence in environmental negotiations and predominantly deny any responsibility in dealing with Indigenous Peoples’ Organisations.

The report calls for open and public debate on the development of oil and gas in the Arctic by the UK oil industry.

New report released today – RBS coal finance on launch day of RBS-sponsored Climate Week

dm_0.jpg
Download the report - www.platformlondon.org/dm.pdf
Watch the video - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuWGg6a__gE
Check out the online presentation summary - http://prezi.com/2zc3gxujogli/dirty-money/
All over the world, diverse groups from community activists to schoolchildren, small businesses to faith-based networks, are starting to take action on climate change. Big business is following suit, but often with tactics that bring their integrity into question. Climate change is being used as to create a new kind of brand identity, without any of the fundamental changes needed to tackle the root causes of the problem itself – the use of fossil fuels.

‘Dirty Money – Corporate greenwash and RBS coal finance’ takes the case of the Royal Bank of Scotland, an international bank with interests across the fossil fuel sector that is promoting itself as a genuine actor in climate change efforts. RBS is the UK high street bank that has been most heavily involved in financing the hydrocarbon industry. It is sponsoring Climate Week (http://www.climateweek.com/), a nation-wide event involving hundreds of organisations around the country that is undermined by sponsorship from RBS.

In the years from 2008 to 2010 inclusive, RBS was involved in providing finance worth almost €8 billion to companies listed in the world’s 20 biggest operators of coal mines and generators of coal-based electricity.

All international banks were ranked according to the amount of finance they had been involved in providing to the 20 biggest coal mining operators and the 20 biggest generators of coal-based electricity. For the 20 largest coal companies, RBS was ranked 8th out of 35, with HSBC ranking 10th, and Barclays 29th. For the 20 largest coal-based electricity generators, RBS was ranked 3rd, with Barclays coming 4th and HSBC 11th out of 69.

www.platformlondon.org/dm.pdf

Power & Privilege Training

Power and privilege training has become commonplace in US social justice activism over the past decade as an integral part of making real and lasting change. Here in the UK, interest in engaging with this practice and developing our own models in a different context is growing; in Bristol in 2009 activists held a Race & Privilege conference (www.raceprivilegeidentity.wordpress.com), there was a workshop at Coal Action Scotland’s Outdoor SkillShare (www.outdoorskillshare.noflag.org.uk/?page_id=7) in June 2010, and Seeds for Change (www.seedsforchange.org.uk) also held one at the Earth First Gathering August 2010. Also growing in the past two years, and a great point of reference, So We Stand (www.diyeducation.wordpress.com) “is an emerging grassroots movement of people who consciously work for empowering social change to develop multiracial politics and self defence strategies for environmental and climate justice.”

The practice stems from concern that too often it seems the patterns of the very social structures we are trying to shift are repeated in workplaces, collectives and groups. Seeing this calls for an examination of the issues on a much more personal, yet collective, level. From meetings dominated by speakers with male privilege, to networks dominated by middle class people with white privilege, looking at how privilege operates in our social interactions is a useful step towards shifting social relations. Being more aware of what’s actually going on can help us pin point what needs to change.

This week was our first session, and we’re keenly aware that doing a training can’t ‘heal’ us. Thinking about power and privilege is something we’ll all hopefully continue to do in our work for decades to come, rather than something we can ‘quick-fix’ capitalismo-style. The practice is not intended to be trust-building, but often to in fact make people feel uncomfortable in order to raise their awareness. Doing the training however involves an exploration of trust and an endeavour to be non-judgemental.

Our process will continue, both practically at PLATFORM, and in many other spaces beyond. Even though we’re just beginning, we wanted to share the resources we used, adapted and made to do this, for anyone else who is interested in developing this work in the UK.

Download our training outline: www.platformlondon.org/PowerPrivilegeTraining.pdf

Brilliant articles, most of which articulate a US perspective:
“White privilege: unpacking the invisible knapsack” by Peggy McIntosh (www.rantcollective.net/article.php?id=74)
“Tools for White Guys who are working for social change”
(www.rantcollective.net/article.php?id=36)
“Going to places that scare me: personal reflections challenging male supremacy”
(www.xyonline.net/content/going-places-scare-me-personal-reflections-chal…)
Principles of Anti-Oppression
(www.infoshop.org/page/Anti-Oppression)

Books:
‘Outlaw Culture’ by bell hooks

Slow Travel to Oslo: diary begins

Entries from Jane Trowell, Anna Galkina, and Rebecca Beinart on their separate Slow Travel journeys from England to Oslo for Gentle Actions in Kunstnernes Hus

ANNA:
[Anna Galkina is a researcher with PLATFORM on Arctic issues relating to oil & gas, environmental and human rights abuses.]
11.11.10 On the way into the Eurostar section of St Pancras, a not very often discussed but sometimes quite painful characteristic of slow travel throws itself in my face with the stamp of a passport control officer: travelling slow involves a hell of a lot more borders. Lucky the EU citizens for whom all is open all the way east till Belarus! I am somewhat lucky too with the two-year UK residence permit and a somewhat unexpected Schengen multi-entry visa in my Russian passport. Even *that* costs me long days and hundreds of pounds spent each year at embassy application centres; privileged I am to have the time and the money for all that border bureaucracy.
14.45 I have stepped out of the confusing, kaleidoscope-like, but refreshingly billboard-free lobby of the Eurostar onto the train, and it is leaving London. I couldn’t wait to prove Jane wrong here with her hypothesis on how high-speed rail separates people, because the last time I glided under the sea at 150mph, I had the most insightful and personal discussion about education, with the cheerful Dutch schoolteacher in the next seat. This time, no such luck: my neighbor leaves for the onboard cafeteria and does not return until Lille, at which point she goes to sleep in her seat.
17.05 At Brussels Midi station, I’m greeted by a massive mural of Tintin riding the front of a train at top speed chasing criminals somewhere in the Wild West.
19.20 The Thalys train from Brussels to Cologne is only half full; I parcel myself away with laptop and headphones. Sometime later, the red unevenly blinking lights of the many windfarms of Germany whizz past. I’m on my way to Scandinavia, where one of the ongoing struggles of the indigenous Sami community is against a massive wind farm, ineptly placed with barely any consultation with the locals. Like oil, like large windfarms, high-speed rail is a huge industrial project, and it seems to me that we should add to arguments over its existence/non-existence (or use/non-use), a discussion of the *how*. Simple example:
Eurostar recently announced that they’re working on extending their connection to Germany, so one could get from London to Frankfurt in under five hours. By 2014.
A bit earlier, Russian authorities announced they’re in negotiations to put up a high-speed link between Moscow and Kiev. Next year.
How is this possible that one link will take four years to construct, and the other, apparently just a year? Well, Eurostar has to spend time and energy on complicated negotiations with landowners, to soundproof and fence off the track, to carry out safety tests. Russian rail apparently doesn’t. The high-speed Sapsan trains between Moscow and St Petersburg have had one train off tracks in the first year of running, and an uncounted number of accidents, including fatalities, for people wandering out onto the tracks. Anyone notice similarities with an other industry?
20.25 First impression of Cologne train station: two Vikings walk side by side carrying a large boombox blasting out disco tunes, followed by a ladybird, a pirate, and a creature made up entirely of flags. More than half the public appears to be in fancy dress and drunk. Random encounters, the joy of slow travel. Turns out I’ve caught St Martin’s, the beginning of the festival season. For the next hour or so I lose myself in carnival, wandering round streets through the dancing and singing crowds, even as street cleaning machines are starting to sweep up the broken glass.
08:10 My company for the overnight Cologne to Copenhagen ride has been two Japanese tourists, a British/Dutch arts journalist, an Australian-sounding man with family in Denmark, and a bald, slightly darker-skinned, non-English speaking man, who takes his large suitcase onto his bunk and sleeps awkwardly half-seated, leaning on it. Before daybreak, the German border police comes in to check passports. The bald man fumbles in his pockets and repeatedly shows his ticket, at loss to explain himself. After a few minutes of this, the border guard grows angry and starts shouting at my fellow passenger, finally pulling him by the collar down from the bunk, and gesturing him to get the trunk down also, and leave the train. A few seconds later the bald man at last produces his passport. The guard stops shouting and leaves, ending the five-minute drama of borders.
10:40 I’ve told the above story to the lovely Steiner kindergarten teacher sitting opposite me on the train to Goteborg. As a counterpoint, she offers stories of organized Polish robbers from over the border which keep southern Denmark in fright. Sweden rolls bleak and industrial in grey and sepia past the window.
16:00 Fields outside are covered in snow! I’m on a train from Goteborg to Kil (pronounced: Scheel), and I don’t even know where Kil is. Sometimes it’s not true that slow travel brings you closer to the world around you: it’s the Deutsche Bahn phone operator who decided I should go to Kil, and I only found this out when looking at my tickets in Copenhagen.
21:00 Safely arrived at Oslo central train station and looking forward to discussing all this…

******************************

REBECCA: Nottingham to Oslo by train
(Rebecca is an artist-activist whose work is concerned with ethics, food, social justice and culture. She was invited by Gentle Actions to contribute to the “Food as Counterculture” habitat. Rebecca worked closely with PLATFORM on the C Words project (2009).

Saturday 6th November

In the novel ‘Slowness’, Milan Kundera equates speed with forgetting and slowness with remembering: he proposes that the speed of modern life is an attempt to forget.

“The man hunched over his motorcycle can focus only on the present instant of his flight; he is caught in a fragment of time cut off from both the past and the future; he is wrenched from the continuity of time; he is outside time; in other words he is in a state of ecstasy. In that state he is unaware of his age, his wife, his children, his worries, and so he has no fear, because the source of fear is in the future, and a person freed of the future has nothing to fear.
Speed is the form of ecstasy the technical revolution has bestowed on man. As opposed to a motorcyclist, the runner is always present in his body, forever required to think about his blisters, his exhaustion; when he runs he feels his weight, his age, more conscious than ever of himself and of his time of life. This all changes when man delegates the faculty of speed to a machine: from then on, his own body is outside the process, and he gives over to a speed that is non-corporeal, non-material, pure speed, speed itself, ecstasy speed.” Milan Kundera Slowness

My ears pop as we go through a tunnel. Then, the intense strobe of bright sunlight through the trees. This is not slow travel, just slower travel. I am on the Eurostar, beginning my journey to Norway. I’m tired and grateful to have two days of sitting on trains ahead of me, looking out of the window, or simply closing my eyes. I am already surrounded by different languages, conversations I do not understand, and I realise that international train travel offers a strange kind of quiet time – permission to sit and do nothing and be anonymous. For now, I am unusually happy to be what Tim Ingold calls a ‘transported passenger’: gliding over the surface of the earth without engaging in a meaningful way with the places I pass through. Some forms of journeying can be the opposite of this:

“Wayfaring, I believe, is the most fundamental mode by which living beings, both human and non-human, inhabit the earth. By habitation I do not mean taking one’s place in a world that has been prepared in advance for the populations that arrive to reside there. The inhabitant is rather one who participates from within in the very process of the world’s continual coming into being, and who, in laying a trail of life, contributes to its weave and texture”. Tim Ingold, Lines

On the Eurostar I do not feel like I am weaving anything: rather I am wrapped in a metal cloak that allows me to switch off. But the fast trains create an interesting internal slowness, a reflective space. Sitting, thinking, reading, writing. Sitting. Not-thinking. The scenes through the window rushing past, a storyboard of Europe’s hinterlands.

My thoughts are interrupted by other travellers who are not so interested in anonymity. On the Thalys high-speed train from Brussels to Cologne, I am sitting next to a rowdy crowd of German football fans, who drink large quantities of beer and rum and regularly burst into enthusiastic out-of-tune song. There is a kind of rhythm to their noise: a chatter of stories, hilarious laughter, an argument about a player, a burst of loud sound and table-slapping. Blah blah, ha ha, rah rah, boom. I try to imagine it as a lullaby as I semi-doze.

I have four hours in Cologne before my night train to Copenhagen. The station is a constant stream of people, meeting, parting, rushing for trains. I walk outside into the night and there is the cathedral, imposing and impressive. The station is brightly lit, grand in its own way with a huge glass front and many places to spend money. Between the new and old architectural triumphs lies a square: strangely lit in the murky city dusk, it seems like a theatre set across which characters parade. I sit on the steps leading up to the cathedral, drink mugwort tea and watch. An old man stands at the bottom of the steps, smoking second-hand cigarette butts with grave concentration. Then he fastidiously checks through the bins with a pocket torch, and finding nothing of interest, moves on. A huddle of teenagers occupy their own patch of the steps, drinking beer and occasionally shouting something that is evidently very funny. Some goths appear out of the dark. A man in a wheelchair plays the trumpet, busking. People wait for people. A lot of wheelie-suitcases make their noisy journeys across the square and are swallowed by the mouth of the station. A couple kiss for a very long time. It starts to rain.

On a journey like this I am struck by how difficult it is to spend time in cities without money. The cathedral steps offer a fine resting place when it’s dry, but the rain drives people indoors. There are not many places to sit if you are not a paying customer. I find a weird bar inside the station, too weary to drag my bags around for further exploration. I drink expensive beer and write. A man comes in to mine-sweep the tables – glugging down some drinks left by people in a hurry before the waiter clears them away. He sees me watching and flaps his hand at me, as if to say ‘none of your business’.

Sunday 7th November

The night train to Copenhagen was not as glamorous as I’d imagined. I haven’t had many sleeper train experiences to compare it to, but I remember a trip to Belarus five years ago. I travelled with two friends on a train from Warsaw to Minsk, to take part in an amorphous art event full of mis-translations and cultural confusions. That train had wallpapered corridors, lace curtains and plastic flowers. Half-way though the journey we stopped in a massive warehouse on the border and waited whilst they changed the wheels on the train: the two countries have different gauges. Intimidating men with fur hats and various weapons demanded to see our papers and shouted in Russian. On the return journey, my friends woke me at midnight to celebrate my birthday with sickly cake and sparkling wine. The guys from the next compartment heard us and joined us with a bottle of very strong bitter alcohol. They told us in heavy Russian accents that they worked for the KGB, but we guessed that if that were true, they probably wouldn’t have told us.

The ‘City Night Line’ is a grubby train with cramped couchettes. Half of the train is destined for Moscow, and I wonder if I could accidentally wake up in Russia. A friendly woman who is in my compartment explains where to stash bags. It is late and there are already people asleep on the other bunks. It’s an intimate space to share with five strangers, breathing one another’s breath; the young guy on the bottom bunk has a ghoulish tattoo and a hellish cough. I am so tired that I sleep soon. When I awake, it’s crisp frosty winter outside, and we are in Denmark. We arrive in Copenhagen at 10am, into a station that is grand but old-fashioned. I put my bag into a locker and walk around the city for a few hours, smiling at the sunshine, the bicycles, and coffee in a cobbled square. I have no guidebooks or maps, so I meet the city in a state of ignorance and enjoy imagining the stories behind what I see. There’s a building guarded by strange creatures, dog-dragon-lions. This area has a lot of weird and wonderful architecture, including the Tivoli amusement park. I walk into a square that has at its centre a screaming bear atop a fountain. As I wander, I think of other journeys I have made, of fairytales and histories, of the stories that make a place. Each place is the seed for an unfolding of further stories, memories and observations that overlap each other, touch each other, that fall like dominoes, each one triggering the next. The way we experience place has so much to do with what we carry with us, both physically and in our heads.

Writing about Time and Duration, Henri Bergson challenges our usual conception of time. He offers instead the notion of ‘Pure Duration’: our experiences as we live them, which are not a linear narrative. He describes this as simultaneous, fluid and flowing time: our inner experiences of the world are overlaid with immediate and remembered emotion, sensation and association. The closest we may come to an awareness of Pure Duration is in our dream life, where there is no linearity. Bergson uses the metaphor of melody as a way of thinking about our experience of duration: ‘The metaphor of the musical phrase conveys the notion of ensemble that attaches to the experience of duration… a multiplicity without homogeneity, in which states of feeling overlap and interpenetrate one another, instead of being organised into a distinct succession.’ (Henri Bergson, Time and Free Will)
I return to the station to board a train to Göteborg. The train sails over a long bridge connecting Copenhagen to Malmo, the water glittering below. It’s a quiet journey, an elderly couple near to me dine on sandwiches, the train slowly fills up. I am reading ‘The Left Hand of Darkness’ by Ursula Le Guin and my mind is drawn into the planet of Winter and attempts at diplomacy between peoples from (literally) different worlds. Occasionally I look up and remember where I am, seeing the neat Swedish landscape slip by and increasingly large forests. I glimpse the sea, and the beautiful orange sun sinking to the horizon. A factory chimney with clouds of smoke suspended above it, so still and pink they seem unreal. I change trains at Göteborg, and start the final leg of my journey. It is dark now and I retreat into my book. Le Guin describes a trade caravan crossing the frozen land of Winter, where no vehicles travel faster than 25 mph: ‘The people of winter, who always live in the Year One, felt that progress is less important than presence.’ When I finally reach Olso I hope that I can hold on to something of this – be wholly present in the rich and amazing concoction that I am about to enter into.

*****************

JANE: 5.11.10, Higham, Kent to Oslo, Norway
St Pancras International. London (16.04) to Brussels Midi (18.59)
After half a day’s work, I’m lugging the borrowed wheelie holdall to London Bridge Station from PLATFORM. It feels like an impossible weight, and I’ve always been suspicious of using a wheelie case for fear of doing my back in again (dragging it along on one side of your body or the other – not balanced). This is definitely an experiment. And it started unpromisingly with several carbon cheats which left me very self-critical.

Earlier, due to the weight of the holdall, I’d had a sneaky lift to Higham station from home, and at the London end, I’d balanced the monster on the rack of my rescued bike on the walk from London Bridge’s bike racks to PLAT. Some hours later, going to St Pancras I was a bit late, hot & bothered, and decided to pay £3 for a short hitch along Tooley Street in a taxi (if a bus had turned up i would’ve done that for sure). Worth it just to soothe my mood at the outset of the long journey.

Mum’s been trying to get me to use a wheelie case for years, but I’d rather carry the weight evenly on both hips with a well-designed backpack, than pull a load with one arm or the other. I love my backpack.

But carrying many kilos of pamphlets and print material, this seemed the best option. And, I won’t have all that material with me on the way back from Kirkenes. But on the way back, I’m not on the train. I’m actually flying for reasons which will unfold. But in terms of me lugging heavy monster, there’s something wrong with this travel plan.

I feel foolish and grumpy. This is the wrong sort of wheelie case, you idiot!! I should have a smug one that sits on four wheels that you roll along with a nudge from your little finger. My slow travel journey suddenly seems long and stupid, and risky to my back. I stare at people humping and rolling their cases, tripping themselves and others up, and realise unhappily that I’m now one of them. I get a trolley.

Most people who travel for business or pleasure, are not travelling with backpacks. Backpacks are a northern/western design for the strong and healthy, and mostly young. You have to be able to swing the load up. You have to have strong legs and shoulders. You have to not mind about wearing clothes that are chafed and scrunched by the pack’s straps.

The other thing is, they’re largely used by people with only themselves to pack for. People with no dependents. They make voluntary slow travel seem easy. And it’s true, this wheelie thing is a hassle.

But that’s precisely the irony.

This is voluntary slow travel.

Most of the world’s people who are forced into slow travelling (or have not options) – ie. migrants, refugees, displaced people, people collecting water or fuel – are carrying everything on their bodies: on their heads, backs, hips, and often pulling children, elderly and animals behind them.

The privilege of choice eh.

I have four changes to make before I arrive at Oslo. A doddle with a backpack. But not for me, now. I’m in the ranks of the cranky older person (and that’s increasingly my future). All this lugging and changing trains is one thing a plane journey saves you, eh. Hmm…
Next time I post the print materials (never mind the horrible cost) and take the backpack.

Brussels Midi (19.28) to Koln (Cologne) Hauptbahnhof (21.15)
I got myself by the door of the packed Eurostar train so I could make a quick exit – only 25 mins to find the Koln train’s platform, and I also wanted to get some Euros, water etc. And I didn’t know the station’s layout. I would need time to get my bearings. I get some help from a nice Brussels woman and follow the streaming crowd to the main station. My eyes are peeled for a cash machine but none are obvious. The next platform is thankfully close, and I find the departure information and seek platform 6A. I have time but not loads. I had humped the monster down the stairs from Eurostar and now looked for a lift. Couldn’t seem to make the lift work so humped the monster up 3 flights to the platform by hugging it to my body like a huge sleeping child, a reverse backpack. (Sudden 20-year old memories of meeting Dan in the port city of Brindisi, on our way to take the ferry to travel around mainland Greece. Me with backpack. Him with the biggest wheelie holdall you’d ever seen. He was seriously struggling, and it was very hot. Every manoeuvre from then on was dictated by this giant. I named it Il Duce, and I meant it in every sense of the word.)

The packed Thalys train to Cologne glides in from Paris and all is good. I dump the monster and find my nice, ample, window seat. Belgium is traversed in the darkness. Announcements in four languages punctuate the ride – Flemish, French, German, English.

It occurs to me again that slow travel that involves several transport interchanges requires the traveller to be pretty confident in themselves if it’s to be a positive experience. You need to have some facility with languages, or be happy to guess what things mean in different languages. You need to be able to ask somehow, point at things, try pronouncing unfamiliar words, or wave your ticket, use sign language if necessary. You must not be too worried about making a fool of yourself. You must want to have lots of encounters with different people: that’s the reason and great reward for moving around like this. But all this asks a lot of people. It can be tiring, and unnerving. Scary and anxious-making at times. For many, the package tour where the tour guide does everything for you surely has its attractions.

Voluntarily choosing slow travel is not for everyone, on grounds of personality. For those who have no choice, they just have to lump it.

Random thought: trains are definitely imitating planes these days. High speed, dedicated lines, they skirt over everyday life. Virgin Pendolino (in Britain) are the worst with their small windows and sense of being crammed in. Thalys is at least roomy. But the high-speedness echoes the disengagement of planes or motorways. On some trains now in UK, carriage with mini-screens in back of seats like planes. Complete disengagement. Very scary. But makes sense in age of iPods, iPhones, iPad, iMe, Playstation etc. Everyone in their own bubble, ignoring the travel, pretending to be anywhere except where they are. My connections are very close together on this trip – no time between stops to dally, take the air, and catch up. High-speed trains plus rapid connection times heightens the blood pressure…

From Koln Hauptbahnhof (22.28) to Copenhagen (10.06 next day)
The overnight train gets in quarter of an hour late from Prague. I find my compartment and am sharing with a family of mum, dad and three beautiful blond boys. I am really tired and we chat a little in English, getting the berths ready, getting settled. Very nice, but too sleepy to really talk. Next morning I wake as if I’ve been truncheoned but after a “City Breakfast” (4.5 euros) in the cafe, looking with wonder at the gorgeous blue-sky dawning day and Denmark’s flat fields, cosy farmsteads and wind turbines in small homely groups, I’m feeling more appreciative and human. I get chatting with Swedish Eva Lena and her husband Per and her kids Samuel,Vincent (twins aged 13) and Dante (aged 10). I tell them what I’m doing in Oslo and Kirkenes and we chat about trains and planes; slow travel; slow food; climate change, threatened species…

Eva Lena is very critical of Sweden. I tell her that I like to think of Scandinavian countries as getting things right – welfare state, standard of living, human rights, environmental policies. I tell her I know it’s a stereotype, and every country wants to think somewhere else has the solution. And that Stieg Larsen has taken the romance out of thinking of Sweden like that. We laugh a little. But she and Per also grunt, exchanging looks. Eva Lena goes on to talk with such dismay about the disconnect from the land in Sweden; that in Italy there’s such a strong food culture, organic food! That this is something that Italy has got right! She says most people in Sweden just don’t want to know about anything like this, as long as they have cheap food.

They live in a small fishing town on the coast towards Goteborg, and then it comes out that Eva Lena has just become a Green Party councillor for her town. She was under no illusions about how hard it would be, that Sweden is so so behind, in her opinion. But although I know she has reason to be daunted, I felt sad that she feels this. She explained that people think of the Greens as having plenty of vision but no grasp of finance and budgets, the economy. I tried to talk about how all visionary movements get told this. It’s a way to dismiss and puncture… you have to last it out. She said “The first meeting I have is budgetary.” I wonder how it will go for her and her three GP colleagues on the council.

The family had just travelled by train to Paris and back for a holiday… I tried to tempt Vincent to write a little about that for this blog. He was listening to our conversation and chipping in from time to time very thoughtfully. It was so so nice. I’m going to keep in touch.

This is one massive reason to travel by train: these chance encounters frequently happen, in a way that you rarely get with planes and airports. Planes and airports are mass transport, but somehow hyper-individualistic, super-selfish and so survival-of-the-fittest too. Mind you, like I was saying earlier, it seems to happen much less in the Eurostar-Thalys-style high-speed modern trains where we are crammed in as if on a plane than it does on old-style and slower trains. My running theory is that high speed militates against gentle or slow conversation. It makes everyone a bit breathless?

10.15am Ritazza cafe, Copenhagen Station
Last time I was here was during COP 15 in December 2009. It was jumping with people. The station’s architecture is so stunning, but I’m struggling with the global success of even smallish chain cafes and eateries. Now even Upper Crust is here (sandwich chain to be found in hundreds of stations across Britain). Here of all places, in the land of the open sandwich and the fabulous breads. At least Ritazza (another chain found in Britain) is selling Ramlosa or Carlsberg water. But Carlsberg is selling water now?? I find a socket and charge the laptop, and think about COP 15, the expectations, the realities and the aftermath. Hmm.

Copenhagen (11.00) to Goteborg (14.32)
11.15am
I am crossing the Oresund bridge that spans the waters between Denmark to Sweden at Malmo. Incredible.
http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/146927main_image_feature_549_ys_4.jpg
16 km long, and opened in 1995 with great technophiliac fanfare, it ended the ferry’s dominion over this route. Now high-speed trains can whiz across; road traffic too. What does this mean? What did it cost to build the bridge in terms of carbon; and what does it mean to zoom in a high-speed train. How does it compare to the ferries? And what does it do to culture? Genuinely want to know…

When the Channel Tunnel was opened, James and I went to the proud exhibition centre at Dover which proclaimed that the Chunnel had its own electricity sub-station on each side, and that the Dover sub-station generated enough electricity daily to power Leicester for a day (population 300,000). Ai?? We argued about the Eurostar. Was it better that people could be tempted off planes for the short run to Paris despite the coal-guzzling implications?

11.35am
We are arriving at Malmo, a city that has hit the news at home in the past two weeks due to some horrendous attacks against immigrants and refugees. Stieg Larsen we need you…The train pulls away from Central station and emblazoned on three silo towers are the giant letters WTF, helpfully explained underneath by the words What The Fuck.
Indeed.

12.35am
Glorious coastal train journey. Must be a bit of a breeze as there are plenty of white horses cresting the waves. Low-lying lands, waterlogged fields. Forests, Low-rise towns and villages.That characteristic dark blood-red colour used on so many houses and farm buildings. A blue sky hung low with big fluffy white and grey clouds. A man does sudoku across the table, and a young girl delightedly nibbles a pastry as her little brother does some kind of Star Wars educational game on his gameboy. The train is packed.

14.30 At Goteborg Central Station, last stop in euroland Sweden
Shopping is my aim – a last chance to buy cheap booze! I lug the monster (who I’ve now have grudging fondness for, realising its not its fault but mine) across the many-laned highway and venture into a shopping mall. Jumping with people. Usual-suspect shops and Swedish ones… Find an indoor beach volley ball competition is going on, complete with sand. Also a karaoke event. Crowds of people. Pretty multiracial. Finally find the supermarket – get a few things to keep me going but I am faced with a disaster – only beer, no wine, and NO spirits. My plan to buy one bottle of Akvavit or whatever for those late night conversations has come to naught. Don’t think beer is what I want. Ah well…

Onwards to Norway. Land of the £6 pint (in a pub)…

Slow Travel to Oslo: privilege, hope, or red herring

Slow Travel Enquiry for Gentle Actions, Oslo.
Disclaimer: this blog is written by Jane and some views may not be shared by the whole of PLATFORM.

When we got the invitation from curators Eva Bakkeslett and Anne Karin Jortveit to work on the Gentle Actions: Art, Ecology, Action project at Kunstnernes Hus in Oslo, it made us think deeply yet again about how to share arts & culture over distance, how to exchange, how to meet across the miles with a commitment to low carbon practices. PLATFORM pretty much operates a no-fly policy except where it is completely impractical or strictly necessary. If this is so, then we must be able to argue the case to each other. We argue the need to physically be there, bearing in mind there is always skype…

It seems to me that we start from no-fly on several grounds: aviation is the fastest growing transport sector and this should be discouraged; aviation fuel is the most expensive (in process and finance) to produce; its exhaust fumes put carbon directly into the most fragile part of the atmosphere where it does most damage; but it’s also crucially about social justice – a growing number of people in the so-called rich world think that it is their birthright to fly cheaply and frequently, when for the majority of the world, basic safe reliable and frequent public transport is out of reach. Even big environmental NGOs campaigning on climate change seem to justify frequent or long-distance flying if it is “for the cause”. Who should get to fly is a big issue.

So, three colleagues have recently gone by train to meetings in Netherlands and Germany; 2 months ago one colleague crossed the United States from San Francisco to New York by train, and then the Atlantic by cargo ship – he was writing a book, so this slow travel made a lot of sense, carving out time to write and think; earlier this year, 2 colleagues travelled by train and coach to Azerbaijan and back – they were researching the Baku-Tblisi-Ceyhan pipeline and meeting the communities it affects in preparation for a book, so this too was a good plan.

On the other hand, a colleague has flown to Iraq and Jordan; colleagues have on a few occasions flown to the US or Canada. We recently submitted a presentation by video to a conference in New York, and have become used to skyping in colleagues from abroad to our events here.

This is about time, money, carbon. And privilege. And thinking it all through.

Working with arts institutions in other countries is therefore one aspect of wider thinking.

The Gentle Actions invitation gives us a chance to build on the experience of our two-month project “C Words: Carbon, Climate, Capital, Culture” at Arnolfini (arts centre) in Bristol last year, where we tried to consider the carbon implications of everything that we did. We thought long and hard about what we put in the gallery not only in terms of aesthectics but also carbon, the implications of the transport and travel of artists, campaigners, activists, audiences and objects, as well as addressing climate change and environmental justice through the artwork and events we programmed. We built low carbon requirements into the seven commissioned artist-activist group’s contracts, and spent a lot of time asking audiences and participants where they had come from. There was quite a lot of pressure from Arnolfini’s director to invite international artists – sister organisations from Argentina, India, United States. We resisted. We didn’t want to fly people in and raising the time and money to have people travel slowly wasn’t possible on this occasion. Two of the C Words artists’ projects were overtly about this issue: The Walking Forest and the Slow Travel Agency.
http://www.arnolfini.org.uk/whatson/events/details/501
http://www.sustrans.org.uk/what-we-do/art-and-the-travelling-landscape/w…

However, backed by Arnolfini’s director and the Chair of Trustees, we also worked to engage Arnolfini’s staff and the tenants of Arnolfini’s huge building (Bush House) in a discussion of how to radically reduce the building’s carbon footprint. We created a guided tour “Stopping the Bush Fire” from basement to top floor about this, attended by 50 people, which included addressing how the finance department might consider banking and pension schemes that avoid promoting carbon culture.

This current Norway trip increases the challenge. It also includes an amazing opportunity to go hundreds of miles north to Arctic Norway – to the town of Kirkenes, 10 miles from the Russian border. We are invited to meet with a group of artists from Barents Spektakel who are putting on a festival in February 2011 on who owns the Arctic seabed, in light of the discovery of massive oil and gas there and the race to extract it as the ice recedes due to global warming. See what they did in 2010 here: http://2010.barentsspektakel.no/
This fits with the work Anna Grigoryeva and Adam Ma’anit -PLATFORM’s two Arctic researchers/activists – are doing, and our agenda for art as a catalyst for change. How we are travelling there and back is another subject of this blog…

With C Words we were only scratching the surface. And we certainly didn’t make public enough what we were trying to do. This blog attempts to address that…I’m setting out from London to Oslo by train, to be followed a week later by Anna. Another artist-activist Rebecca Beinart who is commissioned by Gentle Actions is also recording her slow travel thoughts…

We are really happy to launch artist Richard Houguez’s C Words bookwork “From A to B via C” during Gentle Actions. The piece combines mapping, drawing and statistics with a sometimes hilarious account of the research and realities of trying to move ourselves and artworks from A (London) to B (Bristol) via C (a concern about carbon).

Given the urgency of climate justice and climate chaos we are calling our work for Gentle Actions “Scorch/Drench”. For Scorch/Drench, we are showing 3 pieces – the large print “Carbon Map” to be put in poster tube and sent by Parcel Force; Other two pieces – video “No Condition is Permanent” featuring poets Simon Murray and Dorothea Smartt (African Writers Abroad) and the graphic of our research & analytical tool “Carbon Web” – are digital and are sent through internet. These pieces will be projected. More on that later too.

The first travel decisions were about how to get ourselves to Norway for the week of film screenings and discussions, workshops we are running. Gentle Actions was prepared to pay for our slow travel from both their travel budget and also the artists’ material budget – slow travel is more expensive for sure. Seeing it as part of the artwork made at least the outward journey fundable – ie. the travel could be funded by the travel and artists’ materials budget. The ferry that used to go from Newcastle to Stavanger was stopped a few years back. Terrible shame. The Harwich-Esbjerg overnight ferry was tempting (then the 3-hour train to Copenhagen and then on to Oslo), but due to cost because we hadn’t booked enough in advance and timings, Anna and I decided against it. So, Eurostar to Brussels, Brussels – Cologne, Cologne – Copenhagen (sleeper), Copenhagen – Goteborg (Sweden), then on to Oslo.
Cost for me (full adult): £209 one way, train journey time 28 hours; check-in 30 mins
Cheapest flight London to Oslo – £37 one way; plane journey time just over 2 hours, check-in 2 hours

So, how will it go? What will it raise?

PLATFORM is recruiting a Funding Development Worker

Job Title: Funding Development Worker
Initially freelance 26 days over six months (flexible) with
the possibility of extension into a wider permanent role.

Platform is looking for a freelance Funding Development Worker to strengthen and support its project portfolio by developing new funding sources for this work. This is an opportunity to have an important impact on the future development of a small, pioneering charity, working for social and environmental justice.

There are three main elements to this role-

• Helping develop a wider funding strategy.
• Supporting the development of new funding sources.
• Diversifying PLATFORM’s funding streams – possibly into academic, EU or educational funding

Do you have experience of running and developing projects with excellent communications & networking skills and the ability to formulate and implement a long-term vision? Note: Platform is not necessarily looking for someone with a track record in fundraising (although this would be an advantage) but rather the skills and adaptability that would be appropriate for this role. Part of the interview process for this role will be to make a presentation on possible ways of developing one of our priority funding area’s by adapting your existing skills.

Quotes about Platform

“PLATFORM is about intelligent activism that draws people in.” Officer from a major UK funder.

“PLATFORM has excelled and inspired as an organisation for justice for saro-wiwa, human rights, native people, wild places and the value of tireless campaigning against all odds. Well done-Thank you!” Louise, supporter.

Interested in this role? Please contact us for further information and a job description at info@platformlondon.org Please write ‘development worker’: [YOUR NAME]’ in the subject line. Or by post to: PLATFORM 7 Horselydown Lane, London, SE1 2LN.

PLATFORM strives to apply equal opportunities principles both in its recruitment and in its work. We oppose all forms of unlawful or lawful discrimination on the grounds of colour, race, nationality, ethnic or national origin, gender, sexuality, marital status, age or disability.